Atlas / Oregon

Oregon

OR · instruments, facilities, claims and sources, joined

Instruments

Facilities

Claims

Source rows

4/5

Two-reviewer instruments

Oregon detail is in the $99 state pass. Every record is listed by name below so you can see the size of what is here. Two rows in each table are open as a sample. Missouri is open in full at any time, and cross-state comparison is the $199 all-states pass. Both are launch prices, below the list prices they rise to, and the price you subscribe at stays yours. Pricing.

Instruments

Statutes, tariffs, orders, dockets, ordinancesStarts here in this view

Every statute, tariff, order and docket governing large loads in this state, with the collected text under each one.The rules a project here runs into: what triggers them, what they cost you to leave, what they require up front.The whole regulatory stack in this state, kind by kind.The actual laws, tariffs and orders behind any story about data centers in this state.The regime a project here is underwritten against, instrument by instrument.

5 instrument records.
Instrument	Record	Utility or agency	Threshold MW	Key terms as collected	Sources
PacifiCorp (Pacific Power) Advice No. 25-015, Proposed Schedule 401 Large Energy Use Facility Tariff (Docket No. UE 463) or-puc-ue463-pacificorp-schedule401	docket pending single-reviewer	PacifiCorp d/b/a Pacific Power	$99 Oregon pass	$99 Oregon pass	23
Investigation into Marginal Cost Study Treatment of Costs for Large Customers and Further Modifications to Portland General Electric Company's Rule C and Rule I, Order No. 26-154 (Docket No. UM 2377) or-puc-um2377-order26154-pge-schedule96	order approved two-reviewer	Portland General Electric Company (PGE)	$99 Oregon pass	$99 Oregon pass	16
Large Energy Use Facilities Act ("POWER Act"), 2025 Oregon Laws Chapter 323 (House Bill 3546) or-hb3546-2025-power-act	statute enacted two-reviewer	Public Utility Commission of Oregon (PUC/OPUC)	$99 Oregon pass	$99 Oregon pass	8
Enterprise Zones; Data Center Property Tax Exemption Extension Bar and Moratorium on New Data-Center Authorizations (2026 Oregon Laws Chapter 50, House Bill 4084) or-hb4084-2026-ez-datacenter-moratorium	statute enacted two-reviewer	Oregon Business Development Department ("Business Oregon")	$99 Oregon pass	$99 Oregon pass	10
Oregon Enterprise Zone Property Tax Exemption, Standard (ORS 285C.175) and Long-Term Rural Enterprise Zone Facility (ORS 285C.400-285C.420) Programs, as Applied to Data Centers or-ors-285c-longterm-rural-ez-facility-datacenter	statute enacted two-reviewer	Oregon Business Development Department ("Business Oregon"); local enterprise zone sponsors (city/county) and county assessors	$99 Oregon pass	$99 Oregon pass	7

Provenance key. two-reviewer a second reviewer checked the record against primary sources with no open disagreement. single-reviewer one careful reviewer built it from primary sources and no second reviewer has re-read it yet. disputed two admissible sources disagree and a re-read did not settle it.

Facilities

4 recordsStarts here in this view

The projects on the ground here, and which instruments each one is governed by.Who is already building in this state, at what size, and under which utility.The named large loads in this state, with owner, county and status on every row.The data centers themselves: who owns them, which county they sit in, and what was announced.Announced investment and requested megawatts per project, with the status of each one.

4 facility records. 2 open here.
Facility	County	Owner	Utility	Status	Announced investment	MW requested	Governed by
Amazon Web Services Morrow County / Umatilla County Data Center Cluster (Boardman, Port of Morrow, Hermiston) or-fac-amazon-morrow-umatilla	Morrow and Umatilla Boardman (Port of Morrow) and Hermiston	Amazon.com, Inc., via Amazon Web Services, Inc. and Amazon Data Services, Inc. Amazon.com, Inc.		under-construction single-reviewer	$12B		or-ors-285c-longterm-rural-ez-facility-datacenter
Apple Prineville Data Center or-fac-apple-prineville	Crook Prineville	Apple Inc. Apple Inc.		operating two-reviewer	$250M		or-ors-285c-longterm-rural-ez-facility-datacenter
Google The Dalles Data Center Campus or-fac-google-thedalles	Wasco The Dalles	$99 Oregon pass		operating single-reviewer	$99 Oregon pass	$99 Oregon pass	or-ors-285c-longterm-rural-ez-facility-datacenter
Meta Prineville Data Center Campus or-fac-meta-prineville	Crook Prineville	$99 Oregon pass	Pacific Power (a division of PacifiCorp), recorded in the terms Meta's own info sheet uses: "We worked with Pacific Power, a division of PacificCorp, to meet our 100% clean and renewable energy goal for the Prineville Data Center." That is a renewable-supply relationship stated by the customer, not a filed service election, and no fetched Oregon document states who holds retail service territory at the site.	operating two-reviewer	$99 Oregon pass	$99 Oregon pass	or-ors-285c-longterm-rural-ez-facility-datacenter

4 of 4 facility records name the instruments that govern them. The rest do not, and the table shows that rather than guessing.

Claims

3 recordsStarts here in this view

What parties asserted on the record here, quoted, with the claimant class named.What has been promised publicly in this state about jobs, tax and load.What intervenors and officials said in this state, in their own words.Who said what about data centers in this state, quoted exactly, with the source under each one.Promises made in this market, quoted. We hold what was promised, not what was delivered.

3 claims, each with a named claimant and a claimant class. 2 open here. A claim recorded here is a record of who said what, not a finding that it is true.
Type	Claimant	Claim, verbatim
water	Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, reporting on The Oregonian/OregonLive's public-records findings press	After the city turned over Google's water-use data, The Oregonian reported that the tech company's water use "nearly tripled in the past five years, and the company's data centers now consume more than a quarter of all the water used in the city." Source Source row two-reviewer “Following the settlement reached between The Oregonian and the city of The Dalles, a Google spokesperson told the Associated Press that the tech company would no longer seek to protect its site-level water-use numbers as a trade secret at any of its data centers nationwide. And after the city turned over Google's water-use data, The Oregonian reported that the tech company's water use "nearly tripled in the past five years, and the company's data centers now consume more than a quarter of all the water used in the city."” article body, paragraph beginning "Updates:" https://www.rcfp.org/dalles-google-oregonian-settlement/ Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press - Oregon's city of The Dalles agrees to reveal Google's local water usage
tax_revenue	Jon Soliz, Crook County Assessor government	Nearly $200 million has been given away to Facebook and Apple in property tax breaks since 2012 when Facebook first operated its center, said Jon Soliz, Crook County assessor. Source Source row two-reviewer “Nearly $200 million has been given away to Facebook and Apple in property tax breaks since 2012 when Facebook first operated its center, said Jon Soliz, Crook County assessor.” article body https://theotheroregon.com/2020/04/02/data-centers-a-boon-for-rural-oregon/ The Other Oregon - Data centers a boon for rural Oregon
investment	Amazon Web Services, Inc. (company statement to The Oregonian) developer	$99 Oregon pass

Sources

Ranked highest document type firstStarts here in this view

The primary documents under this state, each with the pinpoint that makes it checkable.The documents behind every number on this page, if you want to read the filing yourself.The filings this state's records were built from, ranked highest document type first.Every document behind this page, with a page or paragraph pinpoint. These are open on every tier.The evidence file under this state, ranked by document type and review state.

86 source rows sit under this state. Every one carries an exact quote and a pinpoint. Twelve are shown here, ranked by document type and review status; the rest are on the record pages they belong to. Every source document and every pinpoint is open, on every tier.

Order No. 26-154, Docket UM 2377 (Oregon PUC) order two-reviewer
“In this order, we address numerous issues related to the design of Portland General Electric Company's (PGE) tariff for large loads, including creation of a customer class for data centers, specifically. While we opened this investigation in response to concerns raised in prior rate case proceedings on large loads from multiple sources, the passage of House Bill (HB) 3546, the POWER Act, created an additional statutory foundation for our work. This decision marks the first implementation of that statute, where the Legislature directed the Commission to allocate or directly assign the costs of serving a data center to those customers specifically and mitigate the risk that other classes of customers are paying unwarranted costs.”
PDF p.1 (Introduction)
https://apps.puc.state.or.us/orders/2026ords/26-154.pdf
Fetched directly via curl (Chrome UA), 77-page PDF (34.6MB). [OR GATE 2026-08-24 - METHOD CORRECTION] This PDF is NOT born-digital. Its producer string is "Adobe Acrobat (64-bit) 26 Paper Capture Plug-in" (Adobe's OCR engine); each page is roughly 1.3 MB of traced vector outlines with an invisible OCR text layer behind it and ZERO embedded images, so the images-plus-text scanned-page test does not fire. The native PyMuPDF layer is measurably corrupt (Staff's -> "Staffs", C AND I -> "CANDI", 100 -> "I 00", AWEC -> "A WEC", PGE's -> "PGE' s", UM 2377 -> "UM2377"). This quote was re-verified against a fresh 300 dpi render of the cited page run through tesseract. DO NOT quote this document from its native text layer.
Order No. 26-154, Docket UM 2377 (Oregon PUC) order two-reviewer
“The POWER Act requires Schedule 96 customers to execute contracts with minimum demand provisions based on the customer's "projected electricity usage," but does not specify the level of the minimum demand. For MGD and MTD, the parties have coalesced around either 80 percent or 90 percent for Schedule 96 customers. We adopt a MGD and MTD of 90 percent, finding that they are consistent with the POWER Act's directive to avoid shifting costs from large data centers to other rate classes and will result in just and reasonable rates.”
PDF p.42 (MGD/MTD resolution)
https://apps.puc.state.or.us/orders/2026ords/26-154.pdf
Same fetch as prior source row. [OR GATE 2026-08-24 - METHOD CORRECTION] This PDF is NOT born-digital. Its producer string is "Adobe Acrobat (64-bit) 26 Paper Capture Plug-in" (Adobe's OCR engine); each page is roughly 1.3 MB of traced vector outlines with an invisible OCR text layer behind it and ZERO embedded images, so the images-plus-text scanned-page test does not fire. The native PyMuPDF layer is measurably corrupt (Staff's -> "Staffs", C AND I -> "CANDI", 100 -> "I 00", AWEC -> "A WEC", PGE's -> "PGE' s", UM 2377 -> "UM2377"). This quote was re-verified against a fresh 300 dpi render of the cited page run through tesseract. DO NOT quote this document from its native text layer. ARTIFACT NOTE: the order prints its own footnote marker 55 inline immediately after the words "projected electricity usage," - the stored quote omits it, which is why a strict contiguity check flags this row. Verbatim once the inline footnote marker is stripped.
Order No. 26-154, Docket UM 2377 (Oregon PUC) order two-reviewer
“We find that Staff's recommendation to require a term of 10 years for a 20 MW load, with the term increasing by one year for each 10 MW increment in load up to a maximum of 30 years for a load 220 MW or greater is reasonable and consistent with the requirements of the POWER Act. Contract renewals will be for 10 years across the board”
PDF p.36 (Rule I contract-term resolution)
https://apps.puc.state.or.us/orders/2026ords/26-154.pdf
Same fetch as prior source row. [OR GATE 2026-08-24 - METHOD CORRECTION] This PDF is NOT born-digital. Its producer string is "Adobe Acrobat (64-bit) 26 Paper Capture Plug-in" (Adobe's OCR engine); each page is roughly 1.3 MB of traced vector outlines with an invisible OCR text layer behind it and ZERO embedded images, so the images-plus-text scanned-page test does not fire. The native PyMuPDF layer is measurably corrupt (Staff's -> "Staffs", C AND I -> "CANDI", 100 -> "I 00", AWEC -> "A WEC", PGE's -> "PGE' s", UM 2377 -> "UM2377"). This quote was re-verified against a fresh 300 dpi render of the cited page run through tesseract. DO NOT quote this document from its native text layer. TWO CORRECTIONS ON THIS ROW: (a) the pinpoint was recorded as PDF p.34-35; the passage is on PDF p.36. (b) The quote previously read "Staffs" (no apostrophe), which the collector recorded as "reproduced exactly as it appears in the source PDF's extracted text" alongside the note "OCR-note: not applicable, born-digital PDF." Both halves of that were wrong: the extracted text IS an OCR layer, and the page itself plainly prints "Staff's" with a curly apostrophe - confirmed by a fresh 300 dpi tesseract pass, by a 900 dpi crop, and by direct visual inspection of the rendered glyphs. Corrected to the document's own text.
Order No. 26-154, Docket UM 2377, First Partial Stipulation (Appendix A) order two-reviewer
$99 Oregon pass quote, 366 characters as extracted. The document, the pinpoint and the review state are open below.
PDF p.72 (Appendix A p.1, First Partial Stipulation opening paragraph)
https://apps.puc.state.or.us/orders/2026ords/26-154.pdf
Order No. 26-154, Docket UM 2377 (Oregon PUC) order two-reviewer
$99 Oregon pass quote, 151 characters as extracted. The document, the pinpoint and the review state are open below.
PDF p.1 (caption, disposition line)
https://apps.puc.state.or.us/orders/2026ords/26-154.pdf
Order No. 26-154, Docket UM 2377 (Oregon PUC) order two-reviewer
$99 Oregon pass quote, 484 characters as extracted. The document, the pinpoint and the review state are open below.
PDF p.5 (HB 3546 definition and the order's own shorthand)
https://apps.puc.state.or.us/orders/2026ords/26-154.pdf
Order No. 26-154, Docket UM 2377 (Oregon PUC) order two-reviewer
$99 Oregon pass quote, 187 characters as extracted. The document, the pinpoint and the review state are open below.
PDF p.5 (order's naming convention)
https://apps.puc.state.or.us/orders/2026ords/26-154.pdf
Order No. 26-154, Docket UM 2377 (Oregon PUC) order two-reviewer
$99 Oregon pass quote, 440 characters as extracted. The document, the pinpoint and the review state are open below.
PDF p.45 (system capacity deposit resolution)
https://apps.puc.state.or.us/orders/2026ords/26-154.pdf
Order No. 26-154, Docket UM 2377 (Oregon PUC) order two-reviewer
$99 Oregon pass quote, 371 characters as extracted. The document, the pinpoint and the review state are open below.
PDF p.50 (Rule I exit-fee resolution)
https://apps.puc.state.or.us/orders/2026ords/26-154.pdf
Order No. 26-154, Docket UM 2377 (Oregon PUC) order two-reviewer
$99 Oregon pass quote, 294 characters as extracted. The document, the pinpoint and the review state are open below.
PDF p.50 (Coalition witness quotation, Souder)
https://apps.puc.state.or.us/orders/2026ords/26-154.pdf
Order No. 26-154, Docket UM 2377 (Oregon PUC) order two-reviewer
$99 Oregon pass quote, 213 characters as extracted. The document, the pinpoint and the review state are open below.
PDF pp.43-44 (minimum distribution demand resolution)
https://apps.puc.state.or.us/orders/2026ords/26-154.pdf
Order No. 26-154, Docket UM 2377, First Partial Stipulation (Appendix A) order two-reviewer
$99 Oregon pass quote, 477 characters as extracted. The document, the pinpoint and the review state are open below.
PDF p.73 (Appendix A p.2, stipulation items 3 and 4)
https://apps.puc.state.or.us/orders/2026ords/26-154.pdf

1 section hidden for this view. Nothing is locked by hiding. Every view can open every section on this page.