Arizona

Every statute, tariff, order and docket governing large loads in this state, with the collected text under each one.The rules a project here runs into: what triggers them, what they cost you to leave, what they require up front.The whole regulatory stack in this state, kind by kind.The actual laws, tariffs and orders behind any story about data centers in this state.The regime a project here is underwritten against, instrument by instrument.

Provenance key. two-reviewer a second reviewer checked the record against primary sources with no open disagreement. single-reviewer one careful reviewer built it from primary sources and no second reviewer has re-read it yet. disputed two admissible sources disagree and a re-read did not settle it.

The projects on the ground here, and which instruments each one is governed by.Who is already building in this state, at what size, and under which utility.The named large loads in this state, with owner, county and status on every row.The data centers themselves: who owns them, which county they sit in, and what was announced.Announced investment and requested megawatts per project, with the status of each one.

1 of 4 facility records name the instruments that govern them. The rest do not, and the table shows that rather than guessing.

What parties asserted on the record here, quoted, with the claimant class named.What has been promised publicly in this state about jobs, tax and load.What intervenors and officials said in this state, in their own words.Who said what about data centers in this state, quoted exactly, with the source under each one.Promises made in this market, quoted. We hold what was promised, not what was delivered.

The primary documents under this state, each with the pinpoint that makes it checkable.The documents behind every number on this page, if you want to read the filing yourself.The filings this state's records were built from, ranked highest document type first.Every document behind this page, with a page or paragraph pinpoint. These are open on every tier.The evidence file under this state, ranked by document type and review state.

98 source rows sit under this state. Every one carries an exact quote and a pinpoint. Twelve are shown here, ranked by document type and review status; the rest are on the record pages they belong to. Every source document and every pinpoint is open, on every tier.

• ACC Decision No. 81587, Docket No. E-01933A-25-0187 order two-reviewer

  “IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Tucson Electric Power Company Energy Supply Agreement with Humphrey's Peak Power, LLC, is hereby approved, as discussed herein... IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that approval of the Tucson Electric Power Company Energy Supply Agreement with Humphrey's Peak Power, LLC does not guarantee any future ratemaking treatment of the Special Contract”

  p.8-9 (ORDER paragraphs)
  https://docket.images.azcc.gov/0000215738.pdf
  Fetched via curl from docket.images.azcc.gov, imageNumber 0000215738 (a Commission-generated Decision document, distinct barcode format from e-filed party documents). Re-OCR'd at 300dpi with pytesseract; the native text layer for this document is even more badly garbled than the Staff Memorandum's (e.g. rendering 'BEFORE THE ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION' with systematic O/0/() and I/l/1 confusion).

• ACC Decision No. 81587 - Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Rachel Walden order two-reviewer

  “The load anticipated by this contract is for 286 MWs, with an additional 64 MWs to serve by in full in 2027. The 300 MWs represents between 10% - 15% of TEP's current generating capacity, and while their recent 2023 Integrated Resource Plan projected load growth in their service territory of approximately 50 MWs per year, this 300 MWs is over and above that forecasted load demand they expect to serve. TEP maintains a reserve margin of approximately 15%, which allows them to reliably serve peak load during the summer. I understand from answers TEP provided during the December 3, 2025 Open Meeting that they have some wholesale contracts that will soon be ending, but that available capacity represents only about half of the entire load contemplated by this contract.”

  p.11 (Walden dissent letter, first substantive paragraph)
  https://docket.images.azcc.gov/0000215738.pdf
  Re-OCR'd at 300dpi with pytesseract. This is the ONLY place in the fetched record (Staff Memorandum plus Decision) where a specific MW figure for the contract's load appears in plain, unredacted text. QUOTE EXTENDED AT THE AZ GATE to the reserve-margin and Dec. 3 Open Meeting sentences, which the instrument's generation_requirements field quoted with no evidence row behind them. EXTRACTION ARTIFACT, not a defect: at 300, 400, 500 and 600 dpi tesseract renders the capital I that opens 'I understand from answers' as a pipe character on this scan. The word is unambiguously 'I'. A byte-exact search will miss that one character; the gate's I/l/1/| glyph-folding fallback matches it.

• ACC Decision No. 81587 - Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Rachel Walden order two-reviewer

  “the switchyard that will need to be constructed to serve this load was not anticipated being needed for reliability on TEP's system for at least 20 years into the future (and thus not included in the Thirteenth Biennial Transmission Assessment that this Commission voted on October 15, 2025). Constructing this switchyard to serve this customer will bring forward a roughly $25 million capital expenditure, which will be paid for through TEP's OATT and thus be included on existing customer's monthly bills in as early as 2027 or 2028. The ONLY way Humphrey's Peak would pay for $20 million of the total cost would be if Humphrey's Peak were to back out of the contract early. Otherwise, the cost will be socialized across ALL rate payers.”

  p.12 (Walden dissent letter, switchyard cost paragraph)
  https://docket.images.azcc.gov/0000215738.pdf
  Re-OCR'd at 300dpi with pytesseract. QUOTE EXTENDED AT THE AZ GATE to the $20 million sentence, which the instrument's cost_allocation quoted with no evidence row behind it.

• ACC Decision No. 81587, Docket No. E-01933A-25-0187 - Findings of Fact order two-reviewer

  $99 Arizona pass quote, 210 characters as extracted. The document, the pinpoint and the review state are open below.

  p.8 (Findings of Fact, finding 3)
  https://docket.images.azcc.gov/0000215738.pdf

• A.R.S. 41-1519, Computer data center tax relief; definitions (raw statute text) statute two-reviewer

  $99 Arizona pass quote, 290 characters as extracted. The document, the pinpoint and the review state are open below.

  subsection A
  https://www.azleg.gov/viewdocument/?docName=https://www.azleg.gov/ars/41/01519.htm

• A.R.S. 41-1519 (raw statute text) statute two-reviewer

  $99 Arizona pass quote, 577 characters as extracted. The document, the pinpoint and the review state are open below.

  subsection C
  https://www.azleg.gov/viewdocument/?docName=https://www.azleg.gov/ars/41/01519.htm

• A.R.S. 41-1519 (raw statute text) statute two-reviewer

  $99 Arizona pass quote, 671 characters as extracted. The document, the pinpoint and the review state are open below.

  subsection E, paragraphs 1(a), 1(b) and 2
  https://www.azleg.gov/viewdocument/?docName=https://www.azleg.gov/ars/41/01519.htm

• A.R.S. 41-1519 (raw statute text) statute two-reviewer

  $99 Arizona pass quote, 619 characters as extracted. The document, the pinpoint and the review state are open below.

  subsection (definitions paragraph 11), 'Qualification period'
  https://www.azleg.gov/viewdocument/?docName=https://www.azleg.gov/ars/41/01519.htm

• A.R.S. 41-1519 (raw statute text) statute two-reviewer

  $99 Arizona pass quote, 650 characters as extracted. The document, the pinpoint and the review state are open below.

  subsection G, paragraph 1
  https://www.azleg.gov/viewdocument/?docName=https://www.azleg.gov/ars/41/01519.htm

• Laws 2026, Chapter 140 (House Bill 4168), enacted session-law text statute two-reviewer

  $99 Arizona pass quote, 575 characters as extracted. The document, the pinpoint and the review state are open below.

  Sec. 31 (session-law PDF pages 51-52, printed 'H.B. 4168 - 51 -')
  https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/57leg/2R/laws/0140.pdf

• A.R.S. 41-1519 (raw statute text) statute two-reviewer

  $99 Arizona pass quote, 204 characters as extracted. The document, the pinpoint and the review state are open below.

  subsection M
  https://www.azleg.gov/viewdocument/?docName=https://www.azleg.gov/ars/41/01519.htm

• A.R.S. 41-1519 (raw statute text) statute two-reviewer

  $99 Arizona pass quote, 335 characters as extracted. The document, the pinpoint and the review state are open below.

  subsection O, definitions paragraph 12, 'Qualified colocation tenant'
  https://www.azleg.gov/viewdocument/?docName=https://www.azleg.gov/ars/41/01519.htm